This Associated Press article was provided through one of the discussion groups of which I belong. I’ve posted the article below. The issues in Chicago amplify the challenges of positive change in police conduct, especially in a large department. As the article states 99.99 percent of the officers do the right thing but it is amazing how the few rotten ones have such a profound impact on the department and community. Consider that when former Minneapolis Police Chief Bob Olsen was working as a reform chief in New York state, among other things, his car was rigged with an explosive device. Such conduct is demoralizing to the officers and the community they serve.
For the reasons outlined in this article is the motivation for my advocacy for a national clearinghouse of names of individuals who have been decertified by states as law enforcement officers and the need for the development of a national standard by which to hire and train new officers. There also needs to be a consistent standard of compliance measurement of all law enforcement agencies in areas of training, community interaction, use of force and profiling in order to qualify for state and federal grants. It’s not a very popular concept as of yet but the alternative of having a federal justice consent decree order to take over maladjusted agencies is not the best option.
The article is as follows:
Chicago Police Again Mired in Scandal
Updated: October 1st, 2007 11:07 AM PDT
By MIKE ROBINSON
Associated Press Writer
CHICAGO —
Videotapes of angry officers savagely beating civilians and charges that a murder plot was hatched within an elite special operations unit have Chicago’s troubled police department reeling again.
Adding to the department’s woes is word from federal prosecutors that they are investigating claims that homicide detectives tortured suspects into confessing to murders that landed them on death row in the 1980s.
Not since club-swinging cops in baby-blue helmets chased demonstrators through clouds of pepper gas at the 1968 Democratic National Convention have Chicago police been so awash in trouble.
The biggest shock came Wednesday when federal prosecutors charged special operations officer Jerome Finnigan with planning the murder of another member of the unit to keep him from talking to the government.
“This kind of stuff on Page One is just horrible,” and reinforces a misleading stereotype of police, said Roosevelt University political scientist Paul Green, who taught at the police academy for four years.
“The overwhelming 99.9 percent do their job professionally,” he said.
But evidence of deep-rooted problems is piling up.
Finnigan, 44, also is one of six members of the special operations unit, created to crack down on gangs and drugs, who are charged with operating a shakedown operation aimed at civilians. Prosecutors say they have him on tape weighing the possibility of having someone kill a fellow special operations officer to keep him from becoming a witness against him.
Finnigan and his attorney, Michael Ficaro, declined to comment.
In July, three off-duty officers pleaded not guilty to charges that they beat four businessmen in a bar in a videotaped confrontation.
In another videotaped confrontation, off-duty officer Anthony Abbate was seen apparently beating a 115-pound female bartender because she would not serve him another drink. Abbate has pleaded not guilty to a felony charge of aggravated battery.
The quagmire is deepened by five federal lawsuits accusing police and city officials of covering up the torture of murder suspects at the Area 2 detective headquarters under violent crimes Lt. Jon Burge in the 1980s. Burge was fired in 1993 after a suspect in the murder of two officers allegedly was abused while in his custody.
A four-year study by two special prosecutors appointed by a Cook County judge, released in July 2006, found that Chicago police beat, kicked and shocked scores of black suspects in the 1970s and 1980s to get confessions. The report said it was impossible to file charges because the incidents were so old that the statute of limitations had long since run out.
On Wednesday, however, U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald announced the federal government was stepping into the torture case, saying it would seek evidence of “perjury, false statements and obstruction of justice by members of the Chicago police department.”
“It’s political, it’s cultural, it’s systemic,” said attorney G. Flint Taylor, who represents several former death row inmates now suing Burge and city officials.
Attorney Richard Sikes, who represents Burge in the five civil suits, said after Fitzgerald’s announcement that allegations against his client “have been fairly investigated by the special prosecutors who found that charges were not appropriate.”
The department has been slow to put its best foot forward. Officers in the news affairs office said only department spokeswoman Monique Bond could comment.
Bond did not return three calls seeking comment over two days.
Mark Donahue, president of Chicago’s Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 7, said most officers are doing a professional job but the department’s reputation has been hurt by the misdeeds of a minority.
“I subscribe to the few-bad-apples theory,” Donahue said. “It is also due to the attention that the few bad apples are getting from the media.”
The City Council recently revamped the Office of Professional Standards, which investigates charges that police officers abused civilians. Instead of reporting to department higher ups, as it did for years, the office now reports directly to Mayor Richard M. Daley.
Craig B. Futterman, a University of Chicago law professor, says such investigations in the past were shoddy and rarely resulted in discipline against the officers.
“If they investigated crimes the way they investigate complaints against police officers they would never close a case,” Futterman says.